Funds and accountability

Are funds being used correctly?

It is an important question. Start with the records available and what they can establish.

We need records, not assumptions. An approved budget, one company’s share of contracts, or an absence of audit findings alone cannot establish correct use of funds or corruption.

What can we check today?

Approved budget

Reviewed records available

You can view selected projects, amounts, and pages from the budget law. These show what funds are for; a separate record is needed to establish payments.

View the projects

Who was awarded the work

No reviewed contracts yet

Contractor selection and award documents need to be matched to each project. A single awardee does not mean there was only one bidder.

Completed work

No reviewed reports yet

Dated reports of completed work, inspections, or acceptance are needed. Payments alone cannot show how much work is complete.

Audit findings and responses

No reviewed findings linked yet

The audit report, its period and scope, and the agency’s response when available are needed. No finding linked here does not establish that there are no issues.

Questions that need more records

These comparisons do not have results here yet. They first need reviewed records covering the same scope.

Who receives the contracts?

Contract counts or values can be compared for the same place and period. A large share for one company is a reason to ask questions, not automatic evidence of corruption.

How do the budget and contract amount compare?

The budget and awarded amount must refer to the same contract. Their difference alone cannot establish the company’s profit or definite government savings.

Term in official records

Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC)

Read the full context in the records.

Funding, completed work, and audits each have their own documents and dates.

Reading guide